Talk:Beating the TSX
Reader feedback: What is the reconstition date and why then?
75.157.129.65 posted this comment on 23 April 2014 (view all feedback).
What is the reconstition date and why then?
Any thoughts?
Peculiar Investor 05:35, 23 April 2014 (MDT)
Reader feedback: Perhaps a bit more backgroun...
68.144.13.64 posted this comment on 15 June 2014 (view all feedback).
Perhaps a bit more background on who Stanley is - what are his credentials, etc.
Any thoughts?
Peculiar Investor 10:23, 15 June 2014 (MDT)
- Resolved by adding reference to David Stanley.--Peculiar Investor 10:27, 15 June 2014 (MDT)
Reader feedback: This page is quite misleading.
23.233.138.221 posted this comment on 9 October 2018 (view all feedback).
This page is quite misleading. A recent forum discussion debunked the myth of this investing approach by exposing its high dependence on entry/exit points to beat the market: https://www.financialwisdomforum.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=33&t=121334&p=621098#p621096
Any thoughts?
LadyGeek 19:09, 9 October 2018 (MDT)
- This was marked as resolved with the following changes, Difference between revisions of "Beating the TSX" --Longinvest 22:06, 9 October 2018 (MDT)
- I would suggest that the wording of the changes might need some rework as 'wrong month' and 'lucky start month' might be considered loaded language and don't seem consistent with typical wiki word choices. I would also suggest that the additional bullet point in Arguments against the strategy that discusses the Dogs of the Dow is outside the scope of the article, which is specifically excluded in the Section "Dogs of the Dow" --Peculiar Investor 07:13, 10 October 2018 (CDT)
- Another reminder, content in the wiki should at a minimum represent the consensus of the FWF community. I'm not convinced that hurdle has been met with the changes that have been made. --Peculiar Investor 08:26, 10 October 2018 (CDT)
- I would suggest that the wording of the changes might need some rework as 'wrong month' and 'lucky start month' might be considered loaded language and don't seem consistent with typical wiki word choices. I would also suggest that the additional bullet point in Arguments against the strategy that discusses the Dogs of the Dow is outside the scope of the article, which is specifically excluded in the Section "Dogs of the Dow" --Peculiar Investor 07:13, 10 October 2018 (CDT)